|
South Dublin Branch News |
|
| Home | Events | What's About | News | East Coast Sites | Projects | Getting Started | Hands On |
Windfarm to go ahead on the Arklow Bank11th January 2002The Minister for the Marine and Natural Resources, Frank Fahey, has granted a licence to the Eirtricity group for what will be the world's biggest offshore windfarm. The wind farm will be built on the shallow Arklow Bank five miles off the coast of Co. Wicklow and 40 miles south of Dublin. Costing 630 million euro, it will be capable of producing 520 megawatts of electricity. The farm will provide 10% of the Irish Republic's power requirements and lower significantly Ireland's current 86% dependence on imported energy. It will comprise a series of 200 turbines and run for a total of 24 miles. Construction is due to start later this year.
Offshore Windfarms and Birdsas reported in the Irish Times 18/01/02.Birdwatch Ireland says that while offshore wind farms have the potential to make a major contribution to renewable energy production, there is a shortage of information on the impact on birds, including collision with turbines, disturbance and loss of habitat. As offshore turbines may require lighting to meet safety regulations for navigation, this can increase the collision risk for night flying birds.
Birdwatch is seeking legal advice over
the lease granted by the Minister to Eirtricity. Birdwatch
Ireland says it was not consulted about a clause
in the lease which involves it in the
construction of a bird observation post.
In the lease, Eirtricity has agreed to give Birdwatch Ireland a
"once-off payment" of 100,000 euro towards the
construction and maintenance costs of an observation post, where
ornithologists could monitor the effect of the
wind turbines on bird life.
Birdwatch Ireland did not object to the Eirtricity project
but says it did propose during the consultation phase
that studies of the bird life and marine mammals in the area
be carried out in advance of disturbance in the area. It also
proposed that only half of the project be
approved, subject to further environmental studies. An
environmental impact statement was conducted as part of
the original planning application.
Mr Stephen Newton, senior conservation
officer with Birdwatch Ireland, said the organisation did
propose the erection of a fixed observation post as part of an independent monitoring
procedure. However, the lease does not allow for independent
monitoring: it obliges the lessee to carry this out.
"The first response to the platform suggestion was that
there would be health and safety problems," Mr Newton says.
"Paying Birdwatch Ireland half the costs of a platform without
asking us in advance does seem very strange," he says.
Installed wind generated capacity in the EU (end '01)
A much abbreviated and edited excerpt from an interesting paper
on bird strikes at albeit on-shore communication towers, but the findings are not
limited to these:
Thrushes, Vireos, and Warblers are the species that seem the
most vulnerable. These species
generally migrate at night and appear to be most susceptible to collisions with lit
towers on foggy, misty,
low-cloud-ceiling nights during their migrations. Lights seem to be key.
He assess the impacts of communication towers but the findings are not necessarily
limited to radio, television, cellular, microwave towers, etc.
Cats, pesticides, oil spills, towers, etc, account for hugh losses ..
What is it specifically about towers that seems to attract birds? Lighting, again, is critical.
The retina of the bird's eye is far more sensitive to the red and infrared spectra than is the
human eye.
Although research in this area is lacking, birds may be attracted to red lights or become
disoriented by having red
lights disrupt their magnetic compasses. Color (i.e., white, white with ultraviolet, and
specific colors such as red) and
flash duration (i.e., strobed, slow flash, or steady) are two aspects of lighting that can
change its attraction for birds
(Beason 1999). A few reports indicate that white strobe lights, whose ultraviolet content is
unknown, are less attractive to
birds than steady or flashing red lights (Gauthreaux and Belser 1999).
However, current thinking seems to indicate that light flash duration, rather than color, is
far more critical. The longer
the "off" phase between the blink or flash phases of the light pulses, the less likely birds
are to be attracted to the
lighting (Michael Avery, USDA, 1999 pers. comm.). For example, solid or blinking red lights
seem to attract birds on
foggy, misty nights far more often than do white strobes, which may flash once every 2-3
seconds
(3 seconds currently the maximum allowable "off" duration). Again, the "off" phase of the
light seems critical, the longer
that phase the less likely the attraction during foggy, misty, rainy, overcast,
low-cloud-ceiling nights.
The taller the tower, the more likely it will kill birds. As tower height increases, so often
does the number of guyed,
supporting wires. Guy wires are critical in their effects on birds. The greater the number of
guys, the more risk of bird strikes.
If taller towers (more than 199 feet [61 m] AGL) requiring lighting to warn pilots must be
constructed,
the minimum amount of warning and obstruction lighting required by the FAA should be used.
Where permissible by
FAA and local zoning regulations, only white strobe lights should be used at night. These
should be up-shielded to
minimize disruption to local residents, and should be the minimum number, with minimum
intensity and number of
flashes per minute (i.e., the longest duration between flashes, currently three seconds)
allowed by the FAA. The use of
solid red or pulsating red warning lights should be avoided at night. Construction techniques
which do not require the use
of guy wires should be employed whenever possible.
Manville, A. M. II. 2000. The ABCs of avoiding bird collisions at communication towers: the
next steps.
|
|
|Home|
Events|
|